• P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I guess I am failing to understand your question with what I said. Can you word it another way?

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You say your point and their point are different, and I’m not seeing the differences? From my end, it looks like you’re saying the same thing, just with different words.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well I guess at some point the most important point is that she was elected? Beyond that, I’m not sure what you’re getting at.

        • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m just confused because somebody said “it’s not important he was a gardner, it’s important that he’s unqualified”, and you jumped in with a “I disagree, its important he’s not qualified” and I’m just lost.

          Like, are you saying its important to focus on his lack of qualifications, or are you saying you disagree with that?